Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Cross CurrentsFamily Law and Policy in the US and England$
Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content.

Sanford N. Katz, John Eekelaar, and Mavis MacLean

Print publication date: 2000

Print ISBN-13: 9780198268208

Published to Oxford Scholarship Online: March 2012

DOI: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198268208.001.0001

Show Summary Details
Page of

PRINTED FROM OXFORD SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (www.oxfordscholarship.com). (c) Copyright Oxford University Press, 2019. All Rights Reserved. Under the terms of the licence agreement, an individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of a monograph in OSO for personal use (for details see www.oxfordscholarship.com/page/privacy-policy).date: 23 May 2019

From Curtis to Waterhouse: State Care and Child Protection in the UK 1945–2000

From Curtis to Waterhouse: State Care and Child Protection in the UK 1945–2000

Chapter:
(p.565) 26 From Curtis to Waterhouse: State Care and Child Protection in the UK 1945–2000
Source:
Cross Currents
Author(s):

Judith Masson

Publisher:
Oxford University Press
DOI:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198268208.003.0026

Many of the current concerns about the care system in Britain mirror the concerns of the Curtis Committee which surveyed the provision for ‘children deprived of a normal home life’ at the birth of the welfare state. Both in the mid-1940s and at the end of the 1990s, alarm was expressed about the quality of care provided to children looked after in public care. After care by the child’s own family, adoption was seen as ‘the most completely satisfactory method of providing a substitute home’. The development of foster care was crucial. Children seemed to flourish, in marked contrast with their starvation of affection in residential care. There was greater awareness of the severe risks that some families pose to their children. This rediscovery of child abuse provided further graphic examples of the failings of state services through public inquiries into the deaths of children supposedly under state protection. Whilst poverty no longer justifies substitute care, it remains a major factor for families whose children come to the attention of social services.

Keywords:   Britain, Curtis Committee, welfare state, public care, foster care, child abuse, poverty, social services, adoption, residential care

Oxford Scholarship Online requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books within the service. Public users can however freely search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter.

Please, subscribe or login to access full text content.

If you think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

To troubleshoot, please check our FAQs , and if you can't find the answer there, please contact us .