Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Cross CurrentsFamily Law and Policy in the US and England$
Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content.

Sanford N. Katz, John Eekelaar, and Mavis MacLean

Print publication date: 2000

Print ISBN-13: 9780198268208

Published to Oxford Scholarship Online: March 2012

DOI: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198268208.001.0001

Show Summary Details
Page of

PRINTED FROM OXFORD SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (www.oxfordscholarship.com). (c) Copyright Oxford University Press, 2019. All Rights Reserved. Under the terms of the licence agreement, an individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of a monograph in OSO for personal use (for details see www.oxfordscholarship.com/page/privacy-policy).date: 20 June 2019

Divorce in the United States

Divorce in the United States

Chapter:
(p.340) (p.341) 15 Divorce in the United States
Source:
Cross Currents
Author(s):

Ira Mark Ellman

Publisher:
Oxford University Press
DOI:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198268208.003.0015

Recent interest in fault divorce seems part of a more general cultural trend favoring traditional values, a trend which probably also contributes to the downward movement in divorce rates. One might conclude that the arguments for reviving fault law are simply too weak on merits to prevail in the end. The covenant marriage movement has adopted the politically clever tactic of portraying itself as merely giving prospective spouses a choice, and of relabeling the newly available choice with the appealing term ‘covenant’ rather than the more accurate term of fault divorce. Even so, it has had a difficult time making headway since its initial adoption in Louisiana. Arizona amended the Louisiana package to permit divorce by mutual consent, and even by unilateral consent with a two-year waiting period, but even this much weakened version passed by the narrowest of margins. Covenant marriage proposals have been defeated in other states. The belief that marriage and divorce are matters for regulation by private commitment rather than legal compulsion appears to remain strong.

Keywords:   Louisiana, Arizona, divorce, marriage, fault divorce, covenant marriage, consent, private commitment, legal compulsion

Oxford Scholarship Online requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books within the service. Public users can however freely search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter.

Please, subscribe or login to access full text content.

If you think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

To troubleshoot, please check our FAQs , and if you can't find the answer there, please contact us .