Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Expert Evidence and Criminal Justice$
Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content.

Mike Redmayne

Print publication date: 2001

Print ISBN-13: 9780198267805

Published to Oxford Scholarship Online: January 2010

DOI: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198267805.001.0001

Show Summary Details
Page of

PRINTED FROM OXFORD SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (www.oxfordscholarship.com). (c) Copyright Oxford University Press, 2019. All Rights Reserved. An individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of a monograph in OSO for personal use. date: 06 December 2019

The Admissibility of Expert Evidence: (2) The Rule in R. v. Turner

The Admissibility of Expert Evidence: (2) The Rule in R. v. Turner

Chapter:
(p.140) 6 The Admissibility of Expert Evidence: (2) The Rule in R. v. Turner
Source:
Expert Evidence and Criminal Justice
Author(s):

MIKE REDMAYNE

Publisher:
Oxford University Press
DOI:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198267805.003.0006

This chapter examines the exclusionary rule in R. v. Turner. It shows that the Turner rule works well in keeping bad expert evidence out of courts. It adds that the Turner rule does not encourage careful analysis of expert evidence and that can lead to bad decisions. It argues that, as the amount of expert evidence available to the criminal courts increases, less dependence on traditional objections should be given.

Keywords:   expert evidence, criminal courts, traditional objections

Oxford Scholarship Online requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books within the service. Public users can however freely search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter.

Please, subscribe or login to access full text content.

If you think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

To troubleshoot, please check our FAQs , and if you can't find the answer there, please contact us .