Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Sexual Orientation and Human Rights$
Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content.

Robert Wintemute

Print publication date: 1993

Print ISBN-13: 9780198264880

Published to Oxford Scholarship Online: March 2012

DOI: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198264880.001.0001

Show Summary Details
Page of

PRINTED FROM OXFORD SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (www.oxfordscholarship.com). (c) Copyright Oxford University Press, 2020. All Rights Reserved. An individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of a monograph in OSO for personal use. date: 30 May 2020

The United States Constitution: Fundamental Choice Arguments

The United States Constitution: Fundamental Choice Arguments

Chapter:
(p.20) 2 The United States Constitution: Fundamental Choice Arguments
Source:
Sexual Orientation and Human Rights
Author(s):

Robert Wintemute

Publisher:
Oxford University Press
DOI:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198264880.003.0002

In 1960, so-called ‘sodomy’ laws prohibited all oral or anal intercourse, between men, between women, or between a man and a woman, in fifty states in the US and the District of Columbia. The first state to decriminalise oral or anal intercourse was Illinois in 1961, followed by Connecticut in 1969, and twenty more states in the 1970s. After Wisconsin in 1983, the slow, difficult, state-by-state process of legislative reform ground to a halt, and no legislature repealed an anal or oral intercourse law until Nevada and the District of Columbia did so in 1993. In an attempt to accelerate the process, gays, lesbians, and bisexuals turned to the United States Constitution. If the Supreme Court could be persuaded to interpret it as prohibiting the criminalisation of oral or anal intercourse, it might be possible to have all remaining oral or anal intercourse laws struck down with a single constitutional blow. This chapter considers how fundamental choice arguments have been used under the US Constitution in challenging both oral or anal intercourse laws and other kinds of sexual orientation discrimination.

Keywords:   United States, constitution, sodomy laws, anal intercourse, oral intercourse, gays, criminalisation, fundamental choice, sexual orientation, sexual orientation discrimination

Oxford Scholarship Online requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books within the service. Public users can however freely search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter.

Please, subscribe or login to access full text content.

If you think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

To troubleshoot, please check our FAQs , and if you can't find the answer there, please contact us .