Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Freedom of Commercial Expression$
Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content.

Roger A. Shiner

Print publication date: 2003

Print ISBN-13: 9780198262619

Published to Oxford Scholarship Online: March 2012

DOI: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198262619.001.0001

Show Summary Details
Page of

PRINTED FROM OXFORD SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (www.oxfordscholarship.com). (c) Copyright Oxford University Press, 2020. All Rights Reserved. An individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of a monograph in OSO for personal use. date: 05 April 2020

Conclusion

Conclusion

Chapter:
(p.111) 6 Conclusion
Source:
Freedom of Commercial Expression
Author(s):

Roger A. Shiner

Publisher:
Oxford University Press
DOI:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198262619.003.0015

It is necessary to take the array of arguments for the commercial expression doctrine that emerge from the court cases cited in the previous chapters and assess their cogency. The arguments make many tacit assumptions — assumptions about the nature of rights, about what it is to defend a jurisprudential thesis, about the nature of constitutional rights, and about the appropriate way to argue for constitutional rights. Essentially, there are several theses that emerge about commercial expression or commercial speech in the U.S. Supreme Court case of Virginia Board, such as: commercial speech cannot be wholly outside the protection of the First Amendment; the purely economic interest of the speaker of commercial speech is a constitutionally legitimate interest; society also has an interest in the free flow of commercial information, because some commercial messages deal with matters of public interest; for the government to decide which information is proper for citizens to receive is unacceptable paternalism; and there are commonsense differences between commercial speech and other speech, which differences imply that commercial speech may receive a lower level of constitutional protection.

Keywords:   Supreme Court, court cases, constitutional rights, constitutional protection, paternalism, economic interest, commercial speech, commercial information, public interest

Oxford Scholarship Online requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books within the service. Public users can however freely search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter.

Please, subscribe or login to access full text content.

If you think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

To troubleshoot, please check our FAQs , and if you can't find the answer there, please contact us .