Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Understanding and Explaining Adjudication$
Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content.

William Lucy

Print publication date: 1999

Print ISBN-13: 9780198260257

Published to Oxford Scholarship Online: March 2012

DOI: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198260257.001.0001

Show Summary Details
Page of

PRINTED FROM OXFORD SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (www.oxfordscholarship.com). (c) Copyright Oxford University Press, 2020. All Rights Reserved. An individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of a monograph in OSO for personal use. date: 27 February 2020

Introduction

Introduction

Chapter:
(p.1) 1 Introduction
Source:
Understanding and Explaining Adjudication
Author(s):

William Lucy

Publisher:
Oxford University Press
DOI:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198260257.003.0008

Contemporary accounts of adjudication can be divided into those that are ‘orthodox’ and those that are ‘heretical’. Orthodox accounts of adjudication refer to those that, on the whole, fall within the positivist tradition in Anglo-American legal theory. Exemplars of this tradition include Neil MacCormick, Joseph Raz, and Ronald Dworkin. Translated into the field of doctrinal legal scholarship, the orthodoxy becomes ‘rational reconstruction’. That is, orthodox doctrinal scholars take their task to be a good faith rebuilding of the law from the sometimes imperfectly expressed statements of it contained in judicial decisions and statutes. American scholars are by far the most influential proponents of heretical accounts of law and legal reasoning. However, the reasons that restrict the range of orthodox works considered in this volume hold good in relation to heretical work, with the added caveat that there may indeed be important differences between geographical instances of the heresy. This chapter is primarily concerned with the writings of Roberto Unger, Duncan Kennedy, Mark Kelman, Joseph Singer, Clare Dalton, Drucilla Cornell and Pierre Schlag.

Keywords:   Joseph Raz, adjudication, orthodoxy, heresy, legal theory, Ronald Dworkin, rational reconstruction, legal reasoning, Roberto Unger, Duncan Kennedy

Oxford Scholarship Online requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books within the service. Public users can however freely search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter.

Please, subscribe or login to access full text content.

If you think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

To troubleshoot, please check our FAQs , and if you can't find the answer there, please contact us .