Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
The Evidential Force of Religious Experience$
Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content.

Caroline Franks Davis

Print publication date: 1999

Print ISBN-13: 9780198250012

Published to Oxford Scholarship Online: October 2011

DOI: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198250012.001.0001

Show Summary Details
Page of

PRINTED FROM OXFORD SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (www.oxfordscholarship.com). (c) Copyright Oxford University Press, 2020. All Rights Reserved. An individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of a monograph in OSO for personal use. date: 19 February 2020

A Cumulative Case

A Cumulative Case

Chapter:
(p.93) IV A Cumulative Case
Source:
The Evidential Force of Religious Experience
Author(s):

Caroline Franks Davis

Publisher:
Oxford University Press
DOI:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198250012.003.0005

Richard Swinburne provides one of the most recent attempts to use religious experiences as evidence for theism. In The Existence of God, Swinburne argues not only that it is rational to maintain a current religious belief but also that ‘theism is more probable than not’. He recognises that religious experience on its own cannot yield such an ambitious conclusion; it does, however, play a crucial role in a cumulative argument for the existence of God. This chapter examines Swinburne's argument, suggests some modifications, and provides the guidelines for the most crucial part of this book, the response to sceptical challenges. Swinburne expounds and defends the principle of credulity, which must form the ultimate underpinning of any successful argument from religious experience. Rather than tying his principle to experiences with a particular type of percept, to a host of ‘dispositions to believe’, or to viciously circular criteria of veridicality, Swinburne conceives of a principle so fundamental that even religious experiences are subsumed under it.

Keywords:   Richard Swinburne, religious experiences, evidence, theism, principle of credulity, cumulative argument, rationality

Oxford Scholarship Online requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books within the service. Public users can however freely search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter.

Please, subscribe or login to access full text content.

If you think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

To troubleshoot, please check our FAQs , and if you can't find the answer there, please contact us .