Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Without Good ReasonThe Rationality Debate in Philosophy and Cognitive Science$
Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content.

Edward Stein

Print publication date: 1997

Print ISBN-13: 9780198237730

Published to Oxford Scholarship Online: October 2011

DOI: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198237730.001.0001

Show Summary Details
Page of

PRINTED FROM OXFORD SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (www.oxfordscholarship.com). (c) Copyright Oxford University Press, 2019. All Rights Reserved. An individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of a monograph in OSO for personal use. date: 14 October 2019

Introduction

Introduction

Chapter:
(p.1) 1 Introduction
Source:
Without Good Reason
Author(s):

Edward Stein

Publisher:
Oxford University Press
DOI:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198237730.003.0001

According to experiments done over the past few decades, humans make significant errors in various realms of reasoning: logical reasoning, probabilistic reasoning, similarity judgements, and risk assessment, to name a few. Together, these experiments, called reasoning experiments, are taken to show that humans are irrational. Some philosophers and psychologists have developed creative and appealing arguments that these experiments are mistaken or misinterpreted because humans must be rational. This chapter examines the various arguments for human rationality and for the existence of limits to cognitive science and science in general. It shows that these arguments fail and that cognitive science can and should play a role in determining whether or not humans are rational. The discussion has implications for the distinction between empirical and conceptual knowledge, the proper relationship between philosophy and science, and for the project of epistemology. In particular, the chapter suggests that the traditional approach to knowledge errs by ignoring the important role science should play in epistemology.

Keywords:   humans, reasoning, rationality, cognitive science, knowledge, philosophy, science, epistemology

Oxford Scholarship Online requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books within the service. Public users can however freely search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter.

Please, subscribe or login to access full text content.

If you think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

To troubleshoot, please check our FAQs , and if you can't find the answer there, please contact us .