This book tells the story of a quarrel, which began in the House of Commons during the debates on the great Reform Bill, and was carried over into the reviews and the newspapers in the 1830s and 1840s. The clash in the Commons left an abiding mutual dislike and a rivalry which long outlasted the political argument. Both men were skilled writers of invective, but while Macaulay sought a wider fame as a narrative historian, Croker remained fascinated by the political arena and in so far as he could separate politics from history proper, he concentrated on leaving accurate records of the past. This study explains why Croker and Macaulay disagreed, and argues that hasty commentators have misread each man's real motives and substituted others which they could not possibly have professed. Macaulay is a historian every reader can enjoy, but Croker is a historian the professional must respect.
Oxford Scholarship Online requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books within the service. Public users can however freely search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter.
If you think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.