Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Distinguo: Reading Montaigne Differently$
Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content.

Steven Rendall

Print publication date: 1992

Print ISBN-13: 9780198151807

Published to Oxford Scholarship Online: October 2011

DOI: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198151807.001.0001

Show Summary Details
Page of

PRINTED FROM OXFORD SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (www.oxfordscholarship.com). (c) Copyright Oxford University Press, 2019. All Rights Reserved. An individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of a monograph in OSO for personal use. date: 16 September 2019

Conclusions

Conclusions

Chapter:
(p.113) 7 Conclusions
Source:
Distinguo: Reading Montaigne Differently
Author(s):

Steven Rendall

Publisher:
Oxford University Press
DOI:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198151807.003.0007

This chapter inquires into the significance of Montaigne's claim that he adds but does not correct as a statement of a textual norm. When it is read in context, it is clear that the point is that subsequent editions of the text do not supersede or replace earlier ones so much as incorporate and extend them. This chapter tries to formulate some of these implications, and suggests that they constitute an ethics of writing or publishing that echoes throughout the Essais and challenges traditional ways of reading them. One can say that the text enacts passage ‘itself’, the movement of difference and deferral that repeatedly divides the present and postpones every conclusion.

Keywords:   context, ethics of writing, Essais

Oxford Scholarship Online requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books within the service. Public users can however freely search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter.

Please, subscribe or login to access full text content.

If you think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

To troubleshoot, please check our FAQs , and if you can't find the answer there, please contact us .