Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Professional Imaginative Writing in England,
1670–1740'Hackney for Bread'$
Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content.

Brean S. Hammond

Print publication date: 1997

Print ISBN-13: 9780198112990

Published to Oxford Scholarship Online: October 2011

DOI: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198112990.001.0001

Show Summary Details
Page of

PRINTED FROM OXFORD SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (www.oxfordscholarship.com). (c) Copyright Oxford University Press, 2019. All Rights Reserved. Under the terms of the licence agreement, an individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of a monograph in OSO for personal use (for details see www.oxfordscholarship.com/page/privacy-policy).date: 26 May 2019

An Allusion to Horace, Jonson’s Ghost, and the Rhetoric of Plagiarism

An Allusion to Horace, Jonson’s Ghost, and the Rhetoric of Plagiarism

Chapter:
(p.82) (p.83) 3 An Allusion to Horace, Jonson’s Ghost, and the Rhetoric of Plagiarism
Source:
Professional Imaginative Writing in England, 1670–1740
Author(s):

Brean S. Hammond

Publisher:
Oxford University Press
DOI:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198112990.003.0004

This chapter focuses on dramatic writing in the 1670s and 1680s, wherein the problematic nature of borrowing from earlier works was already under heated negotiation. In this milieu, clear financial interests were wrapped up in the issue of allusion. Competing for the production of potentially lucrative playscripts, professional writers saw the theatrical stock of the pre-Civil War era as a rich ground for looting. It was much less prodigal of valuable professional time to annex plots, characters, and dialogue of already proven worth than to create from scratch. Writers could justify this on an aesthetic that required them to make acts of obeisance to eminent literary predecessors. Opponents would seek to deprive them of any honorific status thus collected by making the charge of plagiarism. Examining dramatic practice and the rhetoric of plagiarism as it operates in the literary quarrels between Rochester, Dryden, and Shadwell offers a valuable observation-point on the nature of the first phase of professional writing in England.

Keywords:   Dryden, writing, literature, plagiarism, Rochester, Shadwell

Oxford Scholarship Online requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books within the service. Public users can however freely search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter.

Please, subscribe or login to access full text content.

If you think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

To troubleshoot, please check our FAQs , and if you can't find the answer there, please contact us .