This chapter argues that new chronological forms did not result in a new eschatology at the beginning and end of creation. For this, the cyclic theory continued to be the basis of cosmological time. Elements of the eschatology of linear time do occur even within the broadly cyclic, but there is no single deity controlling time as in the Semitic religions. However, some elements of the eschatology seemed to have encouraged deviations. Even the Buddhist wheel of time is discussed in this context. Among these may be noticed the variations in the structure of the cycle itself, as also the innovative idea of the coming of a saviour-figure (the Maitreya Buddha in Buddhism, Kalkin in Visnu Purana) who could intervene to change conditions and who assists in taking the cycle towards the next golden age. The coming of such a figure, it would seem, may not have been unrelated to the linear perceptions of time.
Oxford Scholarship Online requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books within the service. Public users can however freely search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter.
If you think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.