Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Power and LegitimacyReconciling Europe and the Nation-State$
Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content.

Peter L. Lindseth

Print publication date: 2010

Print ISBN-13: 9780195390148

Published to Oxford Scholarship Online: January 2011

DOI: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195390148.001.0001

Show Summary Details
Page of

PRINTED FROM OXFORD SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (www.oxfordscholarship.com). (c) Copyright Oxford University Press, 2019. All Rights Reserved. An individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of a monograph in OSO for personal use. date: 13 November 2019

Reconciling Europe and the Nation-State in Law and History

Reconciling Europe and the Nation-State in Law and History

Chapter:
(p.1) Introduction Reconciling Europe and the Nation-State in Law and History
Source:
Power and Legitimacy
Author(s):

Peter L. Lindseth

Publisher:
Oxford University Press
DOI:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195390148.003.0001

This introductory chapter provides a brief summary of the book's argument—the administrative, not constitutional character of supranational governance in the European Union (EU), and the convergence of European public law around the legitimating structures and normative principles of the postwar constitutional settlement. The chapter outlines several key distinctions and concepts on which the argument is based, including: representative government, democratic legitimacy, and their relationship to European integration; administrative governance and the distinction between control and legitimation of regulatory power; and the importance of national oversight, if not control, in the legitimation of Europeanized administrative governance. This chapter introduces the notion of ‘historically constituted bodies’ (legislative, executive, executive, or judicial) as the repositories of representative government and democratic and constitutional legitimacy in the European system. It then relates the process of European integration historiographically to the process of diffusion and fragmentation of regulatory power away from these bodies that has been the principle characteristic of modern administrative governance since the 19th century. The chapter argues that, even as regulatory power has diffused and fragmented (first nationally, then supranationally), it has remained dependent on historically constituted bodies of representative government on the national level for legitimation, if not control. This chapter also outlines the elements of the theory of institutional change that supports the entire analysis, operating along three interrelated dimensions—functional, political, and cultural. It argues that, for a durable constitutional settlement to occur, these various dimensions must be ‘reconciled.’ It further argues that the national legitimating mechanisms described in the remainder of the book have developed to do the work of reconciliation that this introductory chapter describes.

Keywords:   European Union, postwar constitutional settlement, administrative governance, representative government, oversight, historically constituted bodies, diffusion of regulatory power, fragmentation of regulatory power, legitimacy-control distinction, institutional change, reconciliation

Oxford Scholarship Online requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books within the service. Public users can however freely search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter.

Please, subscribe or login to access full text content.

If you think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

To troubleshoot, please check our FAQs , and if you can't find the answer there, please contact us .