Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Social Movements and the Transformation of American Health Care$
Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content.

Jane Banaszak-Holl, Sandra Levitsky, and Mayer Zald

Print publication date: 2010

Print ISBN-13: 9780195388299

Published to Oxford Scholarship Online: September 2010

DOI: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195388299.001.0001

Show Summary Details
Page of

PRINTED FROM OXFORD SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (www.oxfordscholarship.com). (c) Copyright Oxford University Press, 2019. All Rights Reserved. An individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of a monograph in OSO for personal use. date: 24 August 2019

The Strength of Diverse Ties *

The Strength of Diverse Ties *

Multiple Hybridity in the Politics of Inclusion and Difference in U.S. Biomedical Research

Chapter:
(p.79) 6 The Strength of Diverse Ties*
Source:
Social Movements and the Transformation of American Health Care
Author(s):

Steven Epstein

Publisher:
Oxford University Press
DOI:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195388299.003.0006

Epstein considers collective efforts to transform federal health regulations guiding clinical research. Since 1986, federal laws, policies, and guidelines have either required or encouraged researchers to include women, racial and ethnic minorities, children, the elderly, and other groups within clinical research populations. This chapter analyzes the rise of the “anti‐standardization resistance movement” that led to these institutional changes in law and policy. Epstein argues that the success of this effort depended in part on the hybrid character of the reformers' work. Specifically, the reform project was hybrid in its formal composition (consisting of a tacit coalition of numerous overlapping health movements); in its social basis (combining disease‐specific activism with activism organized around social identities); in its knowledge politics (crossing the lines that supposedly divide laypeople from experts); in its power politics (encompassing ordinary people as well as elites, and biomedical outsiders as well as insiders); in its social location (crossing boundaries between civil society, market institutions, and the state); and in its tactics (combining reformist and radical approaches). While the hybrid character of the reform effort created a risk of internal conflict, Epstein argues that it also created important opportunities for the successful framing of the political project.

Keywords:   social movements, collective action, interest groups, health care, coalitions, clinical research, policy reform, mobilization

Oxford Scholarship Online requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books within the service. Public users can however freely search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter.

Please, subscribe or login to access full text content.

If you think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

To troubleshoot, please check our FAQs , and if you can't find the answer there, please contact us .