5 Reading Monsters
- Seneca and the Idea of Tragedy
- Oxford University Press
The Roman poet Martial (ad 40–102), writing in the generation after Seneca, identified the key to Seneca’s plays: He said that to read tragedy was to “read monsters.” Monstra, shocking, unnatural events that offered warnings from the gods, were a central element in Roman religion and a defining feature of Seneca’s plays. They were on the one hand “just and lively images” of the sort the Stoics identified with tragedy; on the other hand they regularly “represented the passions,” emerging from the underworld as the Erinyes or Furies. To read these monsters means to read Vergil as Seneca and later Freud did, for both read Vergil as psychologists, seeking in the signs of the body evidence for the nature of the soul. Whereas Alessandro Schiesaro sees Seneca’s plays as the mad poet’s dreams, this chapter argues instead that they should be read as the analyst’s interpretations.
monsters, Monstra, furies, Vergil, Seneca, Freud, Schiesaro
Oxford Scholarship Online requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books within the service. Public users can however freely search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter.
Please, subscribe or login to access full text content.
If you think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.
To troubleshoot, please check our
, and if you can't find the answer there, please