Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
A Matter of DisputeMorality, Democracy, and Law$
Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content.

Christopher J. Peters

Print publication date: 2011

Print ISBN-13: 9780195387223

Published to Oxford Scholarship Online: May 2011

DOI: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195387223.001.0001

Show Summary Details
Page of

PRINTED FROM OXFORD SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (www.oxfordscholarship.com). (c) Copyright Oxford University Press, 2019. All Rights Reserved. An individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of a monograph in OSO for personal use. date: 14 October 2019

Constitutional process

Constitutional process

Chapter:
(p.273) 8. Constitutional process
Source:
A Matter of Dispute
Author(s):

Christopher J. Peters (Contributor Webpage)

Publisher:
Oxford University Press
DOI:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195387223.003.0009

This chapter continues Chapter 7's defense of constitutional law and judicial review, focusing on both the relative impartiality and the reasonable competence of constitutional procedures. It explains how the most frequently criticized aspects of constitutional process—its obsession with the past, its constraint by a text, the political insulation of its judges—give it a crucial advantage in impartiality over ordinary democracy with respect to issues of democratic authority. The chapter also contends that the superdemocratic nature of the framing and amendment processes, the long-term political dynamics of constitutional decision making, and the participatory nature of constitutional adjudication combine to generate reasonable democratic competence. It rejects strict formalism and open-ended pragmatism in constitutional interpretation, offering instead a methodology based on the concepts of semantic intention and justification discussed in Chapter 5. It closes by comparing the dispute-resolution approach to the popular responses to the countermajoritarian difficulty canvassed in Chapter 7.

Keywords:   countermajoritarian difficulty, constitutional law, judicial review, impartiality, decision-making competence, constitutional process, textualism, originalism, legal pragmatism, constitutional framing

Oxford Scholarship Online requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books within the service. Public users can however freely search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter.

Please, subscribe or login to access full text content.

If you think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

To troubleshoot, please check our FAQs , and if you can't find the answer there, please contact us .