Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Methods of InterpretationHow the Supreme Court Reads the Constitution$
Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content.

Lackland H. Bloom Jr

Print publication date: 2009

Print ISBN-13: 9780195377118

Published to Oxford Scholarship Online: September 2009

DOI: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195377118.001.0001

Show Summary Details
Page of

PRINTED FROM OXFORD SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (www.oxfordscholarship.com). (c) Copyright Oxford University Press, 2019. All Rights Reserved. An individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of a monograph in OSO for personal use. date: 20 September 2019

Ethical Argument

Ethical Argument

Chapter:
(p.371) eleven Ethical Argument
Source:
Methods of Interpretation
Author(s):

Lackland H. Bloom

Publisher:
Oxford University Press
DOI:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195377118.003.0011

This chapter discusses the use of ethical argument by the Court. It examines the arguable employment of such methodology under the Cruel and Unusual Punishment Clause of the Eighth Amendment focusing on the death penalty and length of sentence cases. It then considers the use of this type of argument through substantive due process by examining punitive damage and the right to privacy cases. Finally, it discusses the concept of ethical argument in the reapportionment decisions.

Keywords:   ethical, Eighth Amendment, Cruel and Unusual Punishment, death penalty, length of sentence, Substantive Due Process, punitive damages, Right to Privacy, reapportionment

Oxford Scholarship Online requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books within the service. Public users can however freely search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter.

Please, subscribe or login to access full text content.

If you think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

To troubleshoot, please check our FAQs , and if you can't find the answer there, please contact us .