Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
The Thief of TimePhilosophical Essays on Procrastination$
Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content.

Chrisoula Andreou and Mark D. White

Print publication date: 2010

Print ISBN-13: 9780195376685

Published to Oxford Scholarship Online: May 2010

DOI: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195376685.001.0001

Show Summary Details
Page of

PRINTED FROM OXFORD SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (www.oxfordscholarship.com). (c) Copyright Oxford University Press, 2019. All Rights Reserved. An individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of a monograph in OSO for personal use. date: 20 October 2019

Intransitive Preferences, Vagueness, and the Structure of Procrastination

Intransitive Preferences, Vagueness, and the Structure of Procrastination

Chapter:
(p.68) 4 Intransitive Preferences, Vagueness, and the Structure of Procrastination
Source:
The Thief of Time
Author(s):

Duncan MacIntosh

Publisher:
Oxford University Press
DOI:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195376685.003.0004

Chrisoula Andreou says procrastination qua imprudent delay is modeled by Warren Quinn’s self-torturer, who supposedly has intransitive preferences that rank each indulgence in something that delays his global goals over working toward those goals and who finds it vague where best to stop indulging. His pair-wise choices to indulge result in his failing the goals, which he then regrets. This chapter argues, contra the money-pump argument, that it is not irrational to have or choose from intransitive preferences; so the agent’s delays are not imprudent, not instances of procrastination. Moreover, the self-torturer case is intelligible only if there is no vagueness and if the agent’s preferences are transitive. But then he would delay only from ordinary weakness of will. And when it is vague where best to stop indulging, rational agents would use symmetry-breaking techniques; so, again, any procrastination would be explained by standard weakness of will, not vagueness.

Keywords:   Chrisoula Andreou, global preferences, imprudent delay, intransitive preferences, money-pump argument, procrastination, self-torturer, symmetry-breaking techniques, vagueness, weakness of will

Oxford Scholarship Online requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books within the service. Public users can however freely search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter.

Please, subscribe or login to access full text content.

If you think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

To troubleshoot, please check our FAQs , and if you can't find the answer there, please contact us .