Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Playing Politics with ScienceBalancing Scientific Independence and Government Oversight$
Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content.

David B. Resnik

Print publication date: 2009

Print ISBN-13: 9780195375893

Published to Oxford Scholarship Online: January 2009

DOI: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195375893.001.0001

Show Summary Details
Page of

PRINTED FROM OXFORD SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (www.oxfordscholarship.com). (c) Copyright Oxford University Press, 2020. All Rights Reserved. An individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of a monograph in OSO for personal use. date: 22 January 2020

Science and National Security

Science and National Security

Chapter:
(p.133) 6 Science and National Security
Source:
Playing Politics with Science
Author(s):

David B. Resnik (Contributor Webpage)

Publisher:
Oxford University Press
DOI:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195375893.003.0006

This chapter examines conflict between science and national security. Though the protection of national security represents a legitimate reason for restricting the autonomy of scientists, scientific organizations, and scientific institutions, this rationale should be applied carefully to protect both the rights of individual scientists and the reliability and objectivity of science. To justify classification of government‐sponsored research, a clearly defined national security interest must be at stake. Classification should be used only when necessary and withdrawn when no longer needed, and research should never be classified for purely political reasons. Censorship of nongovernment science represents a grave threat to scientific progress, creativity, and innovation, and the government should avoid censorship of nonclassified research. The best way to restrict publication of research with national security implications is for scientists to police themselves. Journal editors and other gatekeepers must consider benefits, risks, and options concerning dissemination. Since restrictions on the dissemination of information can significantly harm scientific progress, the burden of proof must fall on those who propose prevention of dissemination. The threat to national security must be a plausible threat based on sound evidence; if threats are identified, scientists should take reasonable measures to prevent them from materializing.

Keywords:   science, national security, classified research, censorship, publication

Oxford Scholarship Online requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books within the service. Public users can however freely search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter.

Please, subscribe or login to access full text content.

If you think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

To troubleshoot, please check our FAQs , and if you can't find the answer there, please contact us .