This chapter presents the oral histories of judges regarding judicial opinions. The courts of appeal are charged with the task of reviewing the decisions of the lower district courts and use the judicial opinion as the exclusive tool of setting precedent, although only a small percentage of cases actually set precedent, with the rest having only marginal utility. A major issue that the courts of appeal struggle with is exactly which of their opinions they should publish. They also struggle with the issues of style and the process of composition. For district judges, there is the issue of how they feel when they get their decisions reversed by the circuit court of appeals.
Oxford Scholarship Online requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books within the service. Public users can however freely search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter.
If you think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.