Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Oral Arguments Before the Supreme CourtAn Empirical Approach$
Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content.

Lawrence Wrightsman

Print publication date: 2008

Print ISBN-13: 9780195368628

Published to Oxford Scholarship Online: May 2008

DOI: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195368628.001.0001

Show Summary Details
Page of

PRINTED FROM OXFORD SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (www.oxfordscholarship.com). (c) Copyright Oxford University Press, 2019. All Rights Reserved. Under the terms of the licence agreement, an individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of a monograph in OSO for personal use (for details see www.oxfordscholarship.com/page/privacy-policy).date: 18 July 2019

Contentious Issues

Contentious Issues

Chapter:
(p.147) 8 Contentious Issues
Source:
Oral Arguments Before the Supreme Court
Author(s):

Lawrence S. Wrightsman

Publisher:
Oxford University Press
DOI:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195368628.003.0008

Not all issues involving the operation of oral arguments have been solved. Congress is now considering a bill that would require the televising of oral arguments. Most of the justices are vehemently opposed to this. Questions have also been raised about whether the intensive questioning of advocates gives them a fair opportunity to present their cases.

Keywords:   televising arguments, effectiveness of advocates, televising trials, audiotapes, intensive questioning

Oxford Scholarship Online requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books within the service. Public users can however freely search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter.

Please, subscribe or login to access full text content.

If you think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

To troubleshoot, please check our FAQs , and if you can't find the answer there, please contact us .