Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Limits of LegalityThe Ethics of Lawless Judging$
Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content.

Jeffrey Brand-Ballard

Print publication date: 2010

Print ISBN-13: 9780195342291

Published to Oxford Scholarship Online: September 2010

DOI: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195342291.001.0001

Show Summary Details
Page of

PRINTED FROM OXFORD SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (www.oxfordscholarship.com). (c) Copyright Oxford University Press, 2019. All Rights Reserved. An individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of a monograph in OSO for personal use. date: 11 December 2019

Optimal Adherence Rules

Optimal Adherence Rules

Chapter:
(p.212) 13 Optimal Adherence Rules
Source:
Limits of Legality
Author(s):

Jeffrey Brand-Ballard (Contributor Webpage)

Publisher:
Oxford University Press
DOI:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195342291.003.0013

This chapter asks whether the members of Group O (see chapter 11) have individual reasons to contribute to the group’s efforts by adhering in at least some suboptimal-result cases. It is argued that if enough of them are actually contributing, then they all have moral reasons to contribute in order to avoid riding free on one another. If too few of them are contributing, however, then the case for contributing becomes more difficult to make. Three possible moral principles are suggested, any one of which would support contributing under conditions of general defection. If one of them is true, then it can be argued that judges have reasons to adhere in at least some suboptimal-result cases, even when most other judges are deviating too frequently. This discussion culminates in the defense of individual policy, which specifies permissible deviation rates for judges based in part on how often other judges deviate. The chapter concludes that we must choose between (1) denying that judges must obey restrictive rule, because we have found no sound argument for that conclusion, and (2) accepting as a foundational principle, requiring no argument, that judges must obey restrictive rule.

Keywords:   imperceptible harm, risk, complicity, free riding, collective wrongdoing

Oxford Scholarship Online requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books within the service. Public users can however freely search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter.

Please, subscribe or login to access full text content.

If you think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

To troubleshoot, please check our FAQs , and if you can't find the answer there, please contact us .