Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Philosopher Kings?The Adjudication of Conflicting Human Rights and Social Values$
Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content.

George C. Christie

Print publication date: 2011

Print ISBN-13: 9780195341157

Published to Oxford Scholarship Online: May 2011

DOI: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195341157.001.0001

Show Summary Details
Page of

PRINTED FROM OXFORD SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (www.oxfordscholarship.com). (c) Copyright Oxford University Press, 2019. All Rights Reserved. An individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of a monograph in OSO for personal use. date: 14 December 2019

Case-By-Case Adjudication of Contentious Human Rights Controversies

Case-By-Case Adjudication of Contentious Human Rights Controversies

Chapter:
(p.147) 11 Case-By-Case Adjudication of Contentious Human Rights Controversies
Source:
Philosopher Kings?
Author(s):

George C. Christie (Contributor Webpage)

Publisher:
Oxford University Press
DOI:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195341157.003.0011

This chapter discusses case-by-case decision-making in human rights controversies. It considers cases in which freedom of expression, or freedom of religion that is manifested in ways that are not simply speech, is curtailed to advance some particular social good.

Keywords:   case-by-case, judicial decision making, courts, human rights, freedom of speech, freedom of religion

Oxford Scholarship Online requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books within the service. Public users can however freely search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter.

Please, subscribe or login to access full text content.

If you think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

To troubleshoot, please check our FAQs , and if you can't find the answer there, please contact us .