Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Constitutional Limits on Coercive Interrogation$
Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content.

Amos N. Guiora

Print publication date: 2008

Print ISBN-13: 9780195340310

Published to Oxford Scholarship Online: January 2009

DOI: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195340310.001.0001

Show Summary Details
Page of

PRINTED FROM OXFORD SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (www.oxfordscholarship.com). (c) Copyright Oxford University Press, 2019. All Rights Reserved. An individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of a monograph in OSO for personal use. date: 16 December 2019

Interrogation Methods and the Eighth Amendment

Interrogation Methods and the Eighth Amendment

Chapter:
(p.129) CHAPTER 8 Interrogation Methods and the Eighth Amendment
Source:
Constitutional Limits on Coercive Interrogation
Author(s):

Amos N. Guiora

Publisher:
Oxford University Press
DOI:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195340310.003.0008

Although addressing the Eighth Amendment prohibition against excessive bail and cruel and unusual punishment can seem out of place in a discussion of interrogation, there is an important relationship between the two. Although punishment can initially be understood to only refer to postconviction actions, the concepts of punishment are also relevant to pretrial detention measures. To discuss this concept, interrogation must be viewed as broadly as possible. That is, not just the actual questioning by an interrogator. From the perspective of the detainee, interrogation incorporates all aspects of life inside the detention center from the moment the doors are locked behind him. An examination of the Eighth Amendment's prohibition against cruel and unusual punishment with respect to the post-9/11 detainees is predicated on the granting of constitutional protections to non-American citizens as if they are American citizens.

Keywords:   pretrial detention, Eighth Amendment, cruel and unusual punishment, excessive bail, Stack v. Boyle, Hutto v. Finney, Guantanamo Bay, totality of the circumstances, Rhodes v Chapman, In Re Medley

Oxford Scholarship Online requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books within the service. Public users can however freely search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter.

Please, subscribe or login to access full text content.

If you think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

To troubleshoot, please check our FAQs , and if you can't find the answer there, please contact us .