Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Constitutional Limits on Coercive Interrogation$
Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content.

Amos N. Guiora

Print publication date: 2008

Print ISBN-13: 9780195340310

Published to Oxford Scholarship Online: January 2009

DOI: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195340310.001.0001

Show Summary Details
Page of

PRINTED FROM OXFORD SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (www.oxfordscholarship.com). (c) Copyright Oxford University Press, 2019. All Rights Reserved. An individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of a monograph in OSO for personal use. date: 10 December 2019

Concluding Recommendations

Concluding Recommendations

Chapter:
(p.149) CHAPTER 10 Concluding Recommendations
Source:
Constitutional Limits on Coercive Interrogation
Author(s):

Amos N. Guiora

Publisher:
Oxford University Press
DOI:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195340310.003.0010

Counterterrorism consists of four “legs”: the rule of law, morality, operational considerations, and intelligence gathering. Successful, aggressive counterterrorism operations reflect a confluence of the four. Balancing the rights of the individual with the equally legitimate rights of the state is the essence of counterterrorism. In a spectrum-predicated analysis, coercive interrogation is the most appropriate, effective, and legal interrogation regime. It is neither torture nor the traditional interrogation regime. It represents a balanced approach that is fully implemented in conjunction with the hybrid paradigm. The hybrid model comprised of melding aspects from both the criminal law and POW paradigms and applying it to the current detainees, based on a historical analogy, provides a unique opportunity to formulate concrete policy recommendations—rooted in the law—to decision makers regarding interrogation. This chapter provides twelve concrete recommendations for all branches of the US government.

Keywords:   rule of law, morality, operational considerations, intelligence gathering, targeted killing, Hamdan v Rumsfeld, void for vagueness, coercive interrogation measures, active judicial review, limits of power

Oxford Scholarship Online requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books within the service. Public users can however freely search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter.

Please, subscribe or login to access full text content.

If you think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

To troubleshoot, please check our FAQs , and if you can't find the answer there, please contact us .