Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
The Ethics of ConsentTheory and Practice$
Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content.

Franklin Miller and Alan Wertheimer

Print publication date: 2009

Print ISBN-13: 9780195335149

Published to Oxford Scholarship Online: February 2010

DOI: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195335149.001.0001

Show Summary Details
Page of

PRINTED FROM OXFORD SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (www.oxfordscholarship.com). (c) Copyright Oxford University Press, 2019. All Rights Reserved. Under the terms of the licence agreement, an individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of a monograph in OSO for personal use (for details see www.oxfordscholarship.com/page/privacy-policy).date: 25 May 2019

Sex, Law, and Consent

Sex, Law, and Consent

Chapter:
(p.221) 9 Sex, Law, and Consent
Source:
The Ethics of Consent
Author(s):

Robin West

Publisher:
Oxford University Press
DOI:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195335149.003.0009

This chapter discusses the views of some radical feminists and queer theorists, who have sought to undermine the distinction between consensual and nonconsensual sex. The chapter is organized as follows. The first part argues briefly that both the (relatively new) queer theoretic and the (getting on now) radical feminist arguments against the liberal reliance on consent as the demarcation between rape and sex are misguided. The second part describes one specific type of harm—the harm caused by unwanted and unwelcome but nevertheless fully consensual sex—that the legitimation of consensual sex has the consequence of denying or at best obfuscating, and argues why those harms are important, even if they are not and should not be the target of criminal sanction. The third part tries to account for our relative failures to better understand them. Specifically, it explores some of the reasons they have generally escaped the notice, not only of liberal legalists concerned with rape and rape law reform, but also of liberalism's critics, primarily radical feminists and queer theorists. Finally, the chapter suggests that those are not good reasons, and that legal theorists should focus more than they do on consensual sexual harms and their relation to law, in the intimate sphere, no less than they do in their political and economic lives.

Keywords:   consent, rape, radical feminists, queer theorists, consensual sex, nonconsensual sex, sexual harm

Oxford Scholarship Online requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books within the service. Public users can however freely search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter.

Please, subscribe or login to access full text content.

If you think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

To troubleshoot, please check our FAQs , and if you can't find the answer there, please contact us .