Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Public Opinion and Constitutional Controversy$
Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content.

Nathaniel Persily, Jack Citrin, and Patrick J. Egan

Print publication date: 2008

Print ISBN-13: 9780195329414

Published to Oxford Scholarship Online: October 2011

DOI: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195329414.001.0001

Show Summary Details
Page of

PRINTED FROM OXFORD SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (www.oxfordscholarship.com). (c) Copyright Oxford University Press, 2019. All Rights Reserved. Under the terms of the licence agreement, an individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of a monograph in OSO for personal use (for details see www.oxfordscholarship.com/page/privacy-policy).date: 25 May 2019

The 2000 Presidential Election Controversy Manoj Mate And Matthew Wright

The 2000 Presidential Election Controversy Manoj Mate And Matthew Wright

Chapter:
(p.333) 14 The 2000 Presidential Election Controversy Manoj Mate And Matthew Wright
Source:
Public Opinion and Constitutional Controversy
Author(s):

Manoj Mate

Matthew Wright

Publisher:
Oxford University Press
DOI:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195329414.003.0015

The Supreme Court's decision in Bush v. Gore (2000) may have decided the disputed 2000 presidential election, but in its immediate aftermath, the controversy lived on in the divisions the case caused in public opinion toward the Court itself. This chapter follows a long line of scholarship that measures the public's trust, confidence, and support for the Court in the wake of controversial decisions. The chapter analyzes data from the 2000 and 2004 National Annenberg Election Studies, which provide various measures of support for the Supreme Court both immediately before and after Bush v. Gore. The findings of short-term polarization immediately following Bush v. Gore, which recedes completely four years later, attests to the resiliency of popular attitudes toward the Court even in the face of its most “legitimacy-threatening” decisions.

Keywords:   2000 election, Bush v. Gore, National Annenberg Election Studies, Supreme Court

Oxford Scholarship Online requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books within the service. Public users can however freely search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter.

Please, subscribe or login to access full text content.

If you think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

To troubleshoot, please check our FAQs , and if you can't find the answer there, please contact us .