Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Ecology and Evolution of the Grass-Endophyte Symbiosis$
Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content.

Gregory P. Cheplick and Stanley Faeth

Print publication date: 2009

Print ISBN-13: 9780195308082

Published to Oxford Scholarship Online: January 2009

DOI: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195308082.001.0001

Show Summary Details
Page of

PRINTED FROM OXFORD SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (www.oxfordscholarship.com). (c) Copyright Oxford University Press, 2019. All Rights Reserved. An individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of a monograph in OSO for personal use. date: 13 December 2019

Evolutionary Ecology of Grass-Endophyte Interactions

Evolutionary Ecology of Grass-Endophyte Interactions

Chapter:
(p.102) 5 Evolutionary Ecology of Grass-Endophyte Interactions
Source:
Ecology and Evolution of the Grass-Endophyte Symbiosis
Author(s):

Gregory P. Cheplick

Stanley H. Faeth

Publisher:
Oxford University Press
DOI:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195308082.003.0005

Because systemic endophytes predominantly inhabit caespitose perennial grasses and seedling recruitment may be relatively scarce, understanding how infection alters the population dynamics and evolutionary ecology of grass populations is challenging. Thus, genet and ramet survival, and size and seedling recruitment must be considered. In some cases, infected grasses increase in numbers and relative frequency while in others infection is neutral or negative with respect to relative frequencies, much like the case with individual host-endophyte interactions. In long-term studies of perennial ryegrass, infection can increase tiller production, change allometric relationships between growth and reproduction with grass ontogeny, and impact the dynamics of the grass population. Further complicating population dynamics of infected and uninfected grasses is the largely unknown dynamics of infected seeds in the seed bank. Nonetheless, this chapter suggests that changes in genotypic sorting in most grass populations based upon infection status is likely to be a relatively slow process that requires long-term experiments to observe. The observation that infection frequencies are highly variable among grass populations and among grass species suggests that there are many genetic, ecological, and geographical (e.g., metapopulation dynamics) factors that determine whether infected plants persist, increase or decline relative to uninfected counterparts. Like other species interactions, Thompson's (1994) geographic mosaic model of coevolution provides a conceptual basis for coevolution of grass-endophyte interactions. Local selection pressures acting on local populations shape endophyte-host grass interactions, and interacting populations may evolve antagonistically or mutualistically such that a broad characterization of the endophyte-grass interaction may prove difficult.

Keywords:   asexual endophytes, coevolution, cost of reproduction, fungal hybridization, genotypic sorting, geographic mosaic theory, host reproduction, infection frequency, mutualism, population dynamics

Oxford Scholarship Online requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books within the service. Public users can however freely search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter.

Please, subscribe or login to access full text content.

If you think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

To troubleshoot, please check our FAQs , and if you can't find the answer there, please contact us .