Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Ecology and Evolution of the Grass-Endophyte Symbiosis$
Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content.

Gregory P. Cheplick and Stanley Faeth

Print publication date: 2009

Print ISBN-13: 9780195308082

Published to Oxford Scholarship Online: January 2009

DOI: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195308082.001.0001

Show Summary Details
Page of

PRINTED FROM OXFORD SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (www.oxfordscholarship.com). (c) Copyright Oxford University Press, 2019. All Rights Reserved. An individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of a monograph in OSO for personal use. date: 13 December 2019

Endophytes and Host-Plant Herbivore Relationships

Endophytes and Host-Plant Herbivore Relationships

(p.50) 3 Endophytes and Host-Plant Herbivore Relationships
Ecology and Evolution of the Grass-Endophyte Symbiosis

Gregory P. Cheplick

Stanley H. Faeth

Oxford University Press

Perhaps the most well-studied attribute of endophyte-infected grasses is their ability to produce alkaloids. These endophytic alkaloids fall into four general classes: 1) pyrrolopyrazine alkaloids; 2) lolines or pyrrolizidine alkaloids; 3) ergot alkaloids; and 4) lolitrems or indole dipterpene alkaloids. These alkaloids have been shown to have deterrent and toxic effects on invertebrate and vertebrate herbivores, as well as anti-pathogen effects, depending on the type and level of alkaloid produced. Hence, protection of grass against herbivores has been viewed as the major mechanism of mutualistic benefit to the host and endophytes have been known as defensive mutualists. However, this chapter shows that there is not a simple relationship between endophytes, alkaloids, and resistance to herbivores. Whereas bioassays and tests with generalized agronomic pests show that alkaloids may indeed increase herbivore resistance, this is not always the case, or may not even be typical in natural grass communities. In more complex communities, alkaloids may have more negative effects on natural enemies of herbivores than the herbivores themselves, thus increasing rather than decreasing herbivory. Endophyte infection can change tolerance rather than resistance to herbivores. In the case of increasing tolerance, infected grasses may compensate for increased herbivory without concomitant loss, or even with increases, in fitness. Finally, recent evidence suggests that asexual endophytes promote herbivory during early host ontogeny which, in turn, increases seed transmission. Because most hosts of systemic endophytes are perennial grasses, resistance and tolerance to herbivores may not be an all-or-none phenomenon, but instead change with host ontogeny.

Keywords:   defensive mutualism, ergot alkaloids, herbivores, insects, lolines, microbial interactions, plant competition, plant pathogens

Oxford Scholarship Online requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books within the service. Public users can however freely search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter.

Please, subscribe or login to access full text content.

If you think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

To troubleshoot, please check our FAQs , and if you can't find the answer there, please contact us .