Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
A Neofederalist Vision of TRIPSThe Resilience of the International Intellectual Property Regime$
Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content.

Graeme B. Dinwoodie and Rochelle C. Dreyfuss

Print publication date: 2012

Print ISBN-13: 9780195304619

Published to Oxford Scholarship Online: May 2012

DOI: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195304619.001.0001

Show Summary Details
Page of

PRINTED FROM OXFORD SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (www.oxfordscholarship.com). (c) Copyright Oxford University Press, 2019. All Rights Reserved. An individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of a monograph in OSO for personal use. date: 21 September 2019

The WTO, WIPO, ACTA, and More

The WTO, WIPO, ACTA, and More

Fragmentation and Integration

Chapter:
(p.143) 6 The WTO, WIPO, ACTA, and More
Source:
A Neofederalist Vision of TRIPS
Author(s):

Graeme B. Dinwoodie

Rochelle C. Dreyfuss

Publisher:
Oxford University Press
DOI:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195304619.003.0006

International intellectual property lawmaking since TRIPS has involved many different actors, in many different fora, under a variety of conditions, leading to the phenomenon of fragmentation. This Chapter discusses many of these lawmaking initiatives (such as bilateral free trade agreements, ACTA, the Transpacific Partnership Agreement, WIPO Development Agenda, and soft law instruments). It addresses both efforts at further commodification and the promulgation of counternorms that clarify the space where TRIPS does not require commodification. The Chapter develops a framework for integrating these developments into the WTO regime and thus gaining the benefits of regulatory competition while minimizing the costs of fragmentation. It rejects the approach of aggressive integration suggested by the International Law Commission; TRIPS offers ample opportunities for norm-integration-through-interpretation. The weight to be given to materials drawn from outside the WTO should reflect the source and timing of the instrument, governance issues, and the relationship between the coverage of the instrument and that of TRIPS. The WTO can also reduce fragmentation through its lawmaking activities, including deliberations in the Council for TRIPS. Treating other specialised institutions (eg the WHO) as partners in the international system might facilitate regulatory cooperation, and the Chapter thus suggests procedural mechanisms to take advantage of that expertise.

Keywords:   fragmentation, integration, Anti-Counterfeiting Trade Agreement Act (ACTA), Transpacific Partnership Agreement, development agenda, soft law, commodification, counternorms, integration-through-interpretation, regulatory cooperation

Oxford Scholarship Online requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books within the service. Public users can however freely search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter.

Please, subscribe or login to access full text content.

If you think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

To troubleshoot, please check our FAQs , and if you can't find the answer there, please contact us .