Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Psychological InjuriesForensic Assessment, Treatment, and Law$
Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content.

William J. Koch, Kevin S. Douglas, Tonia L. Nicholls, and Melanie L. O'Neill

Print publication date: 2005

Print ISBN-13: 9780195188288

Published to Oxford Scholarship Online: May 2009

DOI: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195188288.001.0001

Show Summary Details
Page of

PRINTED FROM OXFORD SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (www.oxfordscholarship.com). (c) Copyright Oxford University Press, 2019. All Rights Reserved. An individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of a monograph in OSO for personal use. date: 22 November 2019

Common Vulnerabilities in Psychological Evidence

Common Vulnerabilities in Psychological Evidence

Chapter:
(p.113) 5 Common Vulnerabilities in Psychological Evidence
Source:
Psychological Injuries
Author(s):

William J. Koch

Kevin S. Douglas (Contributor Webpage)

Tonia L. Nicholls

Melanie L. O'Neill

Publisher:
Oxford University Press
DOI:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195188288.003.0006

Mental health conditions such as post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) and depression are presumed to be valid constructs and are relevant to the legal arena of psychological injuries. This chapter reviews vulnerabilities in psychological evidence from a conceptual perspective. First, it describes how biases and decision-making heuristics may affect forensic assessments. This is followed by a discussion of the implications of assumed base rates of mental health conditions for forensic assessment. It then discusses the differential reliability of structured versus clinical interviews. Problems in the assessment of psychological injuries are reviewed from a hypothesis testing perspective, discussing the following topics—identifying a psychological injury, attributing causality, determination of functional disability, and estimation of prognosis. In addition, the limitations of psychological tests with ethnic minorities are reviewed. Finally, suggestions for cross-examination of expert evidence and promising areas for research are presented. Suggestions for limiting these vulnerabilities within forensic assessments are also provided.

Keywords:   post-traumatic stress disorder, depression, psychological injuries, biases, decision-making, forensic assessment, mental health

Oxford Scholarship Online requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books within the service. Public users can however freely search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter.

Please, subscribe or login to access full text content.

If you think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

To troubleshoot, please check our FAQs , and if you can't find the answer there, please contact us .