Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Copyright's Paradox$
Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content.

Neil Weinstock Netanel

Print publication date: 2008

Print ISBN-13: 9780195137620

Published to Oxford Scholarship Online: May 2008

DOI: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195137620.001.0001

Show Summary Details
Page of

PRINTED FROM OXFORD SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (www.oxfordscholarship.com). (c) Copyright Oxford University Press, 2019. All Rights Reserved. Under the terms of the licence agreement, an individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of a monograph in OSO for personal use (for details see www.oxfordscholarship.com/page/privacy-policy).date: 19 July 2019

 Copyright and the First Amendment

 Copyright and the First Amendment

Chapter:
(p.169) Chapter Eight Copyright and the First Amendment
Source:
Copyright's Paradox
Author(s):

Neil Weinstock Netanel (Contributor Webpage)

Publisher:
Oxford University Press
DOI:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195137620.003.0008

Copyright law's potential for abridging speech has long been recognized in United States case law, legislation, and commentary. Because of copyright, speakers are often unable effectively to convey their message and audiences are deprived of valuable expression. But courts have almost never entertained First Amendment defenses to copyright infringement claims. They have held that copyright's internet “free speech safeguards,” including fair use and the idea/expression dichotomy, provide adequate protection for free speech.

This chapter argues that courts should apply the First Amendment to cabin copyright holder prerogatives where necessary to protect speech. It then sharply criticizes the Supreme Court's rejection of a First Amendment challenge to the Copyright Term Extension Act in Eldred v. Ashcroft. Yet as the chapter notes, Eldred nevertheless suggests a couple of ways in which courts could reinvigorate copyright's internal free speech safeguards in light of First Amendment strictures.

Keywords:   copyright, First Amendment, free speech, fair use, idea/expression dichotomy, Eldred v. Ashcroft, Supreme Court

Oxford Scholarship Online requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books within the service. Public users can however freely search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter.

Please, subscribe or login to access full text content.

If you think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

To troubleshoot, please check our FAQs , and if you can't find the answer there, please contact us .