Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Copyright's Paradox$
Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content.

Neil Weinstock Netanel

Print publication date: 2008

Print ISBN-13: 9780195137620

Published to Oxford Scholarship Online: May 2008

DOI: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195137620.001.0001

Show Summary Details
Page of

PRINTED FROM OXFORD SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (www.oxfordscholarship.com). (c) Copyright Oxford University Press, 2019. All Rights Reserved. Under the terms of the licence agreement, an individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of a monograph in OSO for personal use (for details see www.oxfordscholarship.com/page/privacy-policy).date: 20 July 2019

 Is Copyright “the Engine of Free Expression”?

 Is Copyright “the Engine of Free Expression”?

Chapter:
(p.81) Chapter Five Is Copyright “the Engine of Free Expression”?
Source:
Copyright's Paradox
Author(s):

Neil Weinstock Netanel (Contributor Webpage)

Publisher:
Oxford University Press
DOI:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195137620.003.0005

The Supreme Court has labeled copyright “the engine of free expression.” Copyright serves in that role in three fundamental ways. First, copyright serves a “production function.” It provides an economic incentive for the creation and dissemination of original expression. Second, copyright has an important “structural function.” It supports a sector of authors and publishers who look to the market, not government patronage, for financial sustenance and who thus gain considerable independence from government influence. Third, copyright has an “expressive function.” By encouraging authors, it reinforces the social and political importance of individuals' new, original contributions to public discourse.

This chapter argues that copyright continues to underwrite free speech through each of its production, structural, and expressive functions. Yet the chapter also qualifies copyright's “engine of free expression” moniker. Copyright's support for free speech is far more complex and, in some ways, more limited than the Supreme Court's often‐cited paean suggests.

Keywords:   copyright, authors, publishers, public discourse, free expression, Supreme Court, market

Oxford Scholarship Online requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books within the service. Public users can however freely search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter.

Please, subscribe or login to access full text content.

If you think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

To troubleshoot, please check our FAQs , and if you can't find the answer there, please contact us .