Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Asymmetric PoliticsIdeological Republicans and Group Interest Democrats$
Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content.

Matt Grossman and David A. Hopkins

Print publication date: 2016

Print ISBN-13: 9780190626594

Published to Oxford Scholarship Online: September 2016

DOI: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780190626594.001.0001

Show Summary Details
Page of

PRINTED FROM OXFORD SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (www.oxfordscholarship.com). (c) Copyright Oxford University Press, 2019. All Rights Reserved. Under the terms of the licence agreement, an individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of a monograph in OSO for personal use (for details see www.oxfordscholarship.com/page/privacy-policy).date: 18 June 2019

How Democrats and Republicans Think About Politics

How Democrats and Republicans Think About Politics

Chapter:
(p.21) Chapter 2 How Democrats and Republicans Think About Politics
Source:
Asymmetric Politics
Author(s):

Matt Grossmann

David A. Hopkins

Publisher:
Oxford University Press
DOI:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780190626594.003.0002

We examine the parties’ distinct sources of support in the mass electorate. Republican voters identify as conservatives, conceptualize political choices in ideological terms, view the parties as divided by broad principles, voice support for politicians who reject compromise in order to remain true to their beliefs, and demand a broad shift in the ideological direction of public policy. In contrast, Democrats are more likely to perceive political choices as involving group interests, to view party conflict as arising from clashing group coalitions, and to support politicians who make compromises in order to achieve practical accomplishments. The parties can sustain these asymmetries in the electoral arena because a majority of the public holds left-leaning views on specific policy issues but agrees with conservative principles. Each party can thus claim to represent a popular majority and readily mobilize public opinion in opposition to the other party’s actions.

Keywords:   Public opinion, Democrats, Republicans, party identification, ideology, group benefits, symbolic conservatism, operational liberalism, parties in the electorate

Oxford Scholarship Online requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books within the service. Public users can however freely search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter.

Please, subscribe or login to access full text content.

If you think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

To troubleshoot, please check our FAQs , and if you can't find the answer there, please contact us .