Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Political UtopiasContemporary Debates$
Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content.

Michael Weber and Kevin Vallier

Print publication date: 2017

Print ISBN-13: 9780190280598

Published to Oxford Scholarship Online: April 2017

DOI: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780190280598.001.0001

Show Summary Details
Page of

PRINTED FROM OXFORD SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (www.oxfordscholarship.com). (c) Copyright Oxford University Press, 2020. All Rights Reserved. An individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of a monograph in OSO for personal use. date: 13 July 2020

The Need for Non-Ideal Theory

The Need for Non-Ideal Theory

A Case Study in Deliberative Democracy

Chapter:
(p.203) 9 The Need for Non-Ideal Theory
Source:
Political Utopias
Author(s):

Danielle M. Wenner

Publisher:
Oxford University Press
DOI:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780190280598.003.0010

This paper illustrates some concerns about ideal theory by problematizing deliberative democracy. Deliberative democrats argue that inclusive deliberation conducted among equals who offer reasons in support of positions can confer legitimacy on democratic political outcomes. However, this argument is predicated on idealized assumptions about the ability and willingness of deliberators to interact in ways that either generate epistemically superior outcomes or ensure equal access to deliberation. The chapter argues that these assumptions fail to withstand scrutiny, and that this failure undermines the legitimacy-conferring status of deliberation. Moreover, in failing to account for the ways existing injustices can influence group decision-making, deliberation may also serve to entrench and even propagate those injustices. This suggests that an account of deliberative democracy capable of grounding claims to legitimacy must begin from a standpoint more fully informed about the ways cultural, personal, social, and economic differences can impact the process and outcome of deliberative decision-making.

Keywords:   non-ideal theory, democratic theory, deliberative democracy, epistemic democracy, epistemic injustice, linguistic injustice

Oxford Scholarship Online requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books within the service. Public users can however freely search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter.

Please, subscribe or login to access full text content.

If you think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

To troubleshoot, please check our FAQs , and if you can't find the answer there, please contact us .