Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Deconstructing ErgativityTwo Types of Ergative Languages and Their Features$
Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content.

Maria Polinsky

Print publication date: 2016

Print ISBN-13: 9780190256586

Published to Oxford Scholarship Online: May 2016

DOI: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780190256586.001.0001

Show Summary Details
Page of

PRINTED FROM OXFORD SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (www.oxfordscholarship.com). (c) Copyright Oxford University Press, 2019. All Rights Reserved. An individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of a monograph in OSO for personal use. date: 18 October 2019

Ergative as a PP

Ergative as a PP

Initial evidence

Chapter:
(p.72) Chapter 4 Ergative as a PP
Source:
Deconstructing Ergativity
Author(s):

Maria Polinsky

Publisher:
Oxford University Press
DOI:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780190256586.003.0004

Converging evidence suggests that syntactic ergativity follows from the PP status of the ergative. This evidence comes from several quarters: extraction and subextraction facts, some binding effects, resumption under A-bar movement, and, tangentially, some agreement generalizations. All these properties, independently established as distinguishing DPs and PPs, are used to show that the ergative is PP-like. It does not undergo extraction leaving a gap, and a subconstituent within an ergative expression cannot be extracted either.

Keywords:   binding, subextraction, extraction, wh-question, relative clause formation, agreement

Oxford Scholarship Online requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books within the service. Public users can however freely search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter.

Please, subscribe or login to access full text content.

If you think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

To troubleshoot, please check our FAQs , and if you can't find the answer there, please contact us .