Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
The Neuroethics of BiomarkersWhat the Development of Bioprediction Means for Moral Responsibility, Justice, and the Nature of Mental Disorder$
Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content.

Matthew L. Baum

Print publication date: 2016

Print ISBN-13: 9780190236267

Published to Oxford Scholarship Online: March 2016

DOI: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780190236267.001.0001

Show Summary Details
Page of

PRINTED FROM OXFORD SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (www.oxfordscholarship.com). (c) Copyright Oxford University Press, 2020. All Rights Reserved. An individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of a monograph in OSO for personal use. date: 01 April 2020

Reduced Responsibility

Reduced Responsibility

Distinguishing Conditions in Which Biomarkers Properly Reduce Legal Responsibility

Chapter:
(p.117) 7 Reduced Responsibility
Source:
The Neuroethics of Biomarkers
Author(s):

Matthew L. Baum

Publisher:
Oxford University Press
DOI:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780190236267.003.0007

This chapter discusses the relevance of bioprediction to reductions in legal responsibility. The chapter responds to general objections in the context of neuroscience and law to the use of probabilistic information and probabilistic inferences from group data in criminal court by appealing to Bayesianism and the Probability Dysfunction concept of disorder. The chapter then suggests that one place that neural biomarkers may become relevant to criminal law is through legal structures that evoke the “reasonable man” standard, for example, in provocation. He argues that in cases where there is sufficient evidence that the likelihood of violent response is influenced by certain legally relevant mechanisms, such as increased emotional gravity of the provocation to the person, that biomarker evidence is probative to the legal issue in question. He answers these questions in the context of real-world cases in which testing was performed for a predictive biomarker, the monoamine oxidase A (MAOA) gene-environment interaction.

Keywords:   criminal law, legal responsibility, provocation, MAOA, biomarkers, group data, Bayesianism, neuroscience, probability

Oxford Scholarship Online requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books within the service. Public users can however freely search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter.

Please, subscribe or login to access full text content.

If you think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

To troubleshoot, please check our FAQs , and if you can't find the answer there, please contact us .