Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Deliberating in the Real WorldProblems of Legitimacy in Deliberative Democracy$
Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content.

John Parkinson

Print publication date: 2006

Print ISBN-13: 9780199291113

Published to Oxford Scholarship Online: September 2006

DOI: 10.1093/019929111X.001.0001

Show Summary Details
Page of

PRINTED FROM OXFORD SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (www.oxfordscholarship.com). (c) Copyright Oxford University Press, 2019. All Rights Reserved. An individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of a monograph in OSO for personal use. date: 23 October 2019

Questions and conclusions

Questions and conclusions

Chapter:
(p.174) 8 Questions and conclusions
Source:
Deliberating in the Real World
Author(s):

John Parkinson

Publisher:
Oxford University Press
DOI:10.1093/019929111X.003.0008

This chapter presents a brief conclusion which summarizes the main argument: that fully legitimate, deliberative, and democratic decision making can only be of the macro kind, not the micro. It poses questions for future research and answers a hypothetical question from the Leicester case, giving a group of protestors six reasons to think that the outcome of the citizens’ jury was legitimate, and one reason — its restricted, local scope — to think that it was not.

Keywords:   deliberative democracy, agenda setting, macro deliberation, micro deliberation, scale, localism, Leicester, citizens’ jury

Oxford Scholarship Online requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books within the service. Public users can however freely search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter.

Please, subscribe or login to access full text content.

If you think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

To troubleshoot, please check our FAQs , and if you can't find the answer there, please contact us .