Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Losers' ConsentElections and Democratic Legitimacy$
Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content.

Christopher J. Anderson, André Blais, Shaun Bowler, Todd Donovan, and Ola Listhaug

Print publication date: 2005

Print ISBN-13: 9780199276387

Published to Oxford Scholarship Online: July 2005

DOI: 10.1093/0199276382.001.0001

Show Summary Details
Page of

PRINTED FROM OXFORD SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (www.oxfordscholarship.com). (c) Copyright Oxford University Press, 2019. All Rights Reserved. Under the terms of the licence agreement, an individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of a monograph in OSO for personal use (for details see www.oxfordscholarship.com/page/privacy-policy).date: 25 May 2019

The Winner–Loser Gap: Contours and Boundaries

The Winner–Loser Gap: Contours and Boundaries

(p.33) 3 The Winner–Loser Gap: Contours and Boundaries
Losers' Consent

Christopher J. Anderson (Contributor Webpage)

André Blais (Contributor Webpage)

Shaun Bowler (Contributor Webpage)

Todd Donovan (Contributor Webpage)

Ola Listhaug (Contributor Webpage)

Oxford University Press

Investigates the gap in winners’ and losers’ attitudes with regard to different kinds of attitudes about the political system across established and newly emerging democracies. The results show that being in the political majority generally translates into more positive attitudes toward government, while losers have more negative attitudes toward the political system. We find that there usually is a gap in winners’ and losers’ sense of whether elections are fair, their evaluations of the performance of the political system, as well as feelings about whether government is responsive. Moreover, losing elections appears to diminish people’s support for democratic principles overall, and losers exhibit a heightened propensity to engage in political protest.

Keywords:   democratic principles, efficacy, election outcomes, elections, fairness, losers, protest, responsiveness, satisfaction with democracy, system support, winners

Oxford Scholarship Online requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books within the service. Public users can however freely search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter.

Please, subscribe or login to access full text content.

If you think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

To troubleshoot, please check our FAQs , and if you can't find the answer there, please contact us .