Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
The Suffering of the Impassible GodThe Dialectics of Patristic Thought$
Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content.

Paul L. Gavrilyuk

Print publication date: 2004

Print ISBN-13: 9780199269822

Published to Oxford Scholarship Online: November 2004

DOI: 10.1093/0199269823.001.0001

Show Summary Details
Page of

PRINTED FROM OXFORD SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (www.oxfordscholarship.com). (c) Copyright Oxford University Press, 2019. All Rights Reserved. Under the terms of the licence agreement, an individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of a monograph in OSO for personal use (for details see www.oxfordscholarship.com/page/privacy-policy).date: 25 May 2019

The Christian God v. Passionate Pagan Deities:Impassibility as an Apophatic Qualifier of Divine Emotions

The Christian God v. Passionate Pagan Deities:Impassibility as an Apophatic Qualifier of Divine Emotions

Chapter:
(p.47) 2 The Christian God v. Passionate Pagan Deities:Impassibility as an Apophatic Qualifier of Divine Emotions
Source:
The Suffering of the Impassible God
Author(s):

Paul L. Gavrilyuk (Contributor Webpage)

Publisher:
Oxford University Press
DOI:10.1093/0199269823.003.0003

The author shows that by calling the Christian God impassible the Fathers sought to distance God the creator from the gods of mythology. At the same time the Fathers viewed divine impassibility as compatible with select emotionally coloured characteristics, such as love, mercy, and compassion. Especially revealing in this regard is the patristic treatment of divine anger, an issue that first came to the fore in the debate with Marcionism. The author argues that instead of the context of Hellenistic philosophy the divine impassibility must be located in the conceptual sphere of apophatic theology, where it functioned as an apophatic qualifier of the divine emotions. The divine impassibility was first of all an ontological term, expressing God’s unlikeness to everything created, his transcendence and undiminished divinity, rather than a psychological term implying the absence of emotions.

Keywords:   apophatic qualifier, apophatic theology, Augustine, Cyril of Alexandria, divine anger, divine emotions, Irenaeus, John Cassian, Marcionism, Tertullian

Oxford Scholarship Online requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books within the service. Public users can however freely search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter.

Please, subscribe or login to access full text content.

If you think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

To troubleshoot, please check our FAQs , and if you can't find the answer there, please contact us .