Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Perfectionism and the Common GoodThemes in the Philosophy of T. H. Green$
Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content.

David O. Brink

Print publication date: 2003

Print ISBN-13: 9780199266401

Published to Oxford Scholarship Online: April 2004

DOI: 10.1093/0199266409.001.0001

Show Summary Details
Page of

PRINTED FROM OXFORD SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (www.oxfordscholarship.com). (c) Copyright Oxford University Press, 2019. All Rights Reserved. An individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of a monograph in OSO for personal use. date: 19 October 2019

IDEALISM

IDEALISM

Chapter:
V. IDEALISM
Source:
Perfectionism and the Common Good
Author(s):

David O. Brink (Contributor Webpage)

Publisher:
Oxford University Press
DOI:10.1093/0199266409.003.0005

This chapter focuses on Green's views on idealism. Among these is his belief that that there are obstacles to the idealist conclusion that account for the plausibility of empiricist and Kantian dualisms between the world of appearances and things as they are independently of appearance. He believes that Kantian dualism is unnecessary. Green's views about moral responsibility also presuppose that the self is not outside space and time but rather plays a crucial role as the cause of responsible action.

Keywords:   T. H. Green, Kant, idealists, Kantian dualism, moral responsibility

Oxford Scholarship Online requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books within the service. Public users can however freely search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter.

Please, subscribe or login to access full text content.

If you think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

To troubleshoot, please check our FAQs , and if you can't find the answer there, please contact us .