Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
US Hegemony and International OrganizationsThe United States and Multilateral Institutions$
Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content.

Rosemary Foot, S. Neil MacFarlane, and Michael Mastanduno

Print publication date: 2003

Print ISBN-13: 9780199261437

Published to Oxford Scholarship Online: November 2003

DOI: 10.1093/0199261431.001.0001

Show Summary Details
Page of

PRINTED FROM OXFORD SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (www.oxfordscholarship.com). (c) Copyright Oxford University Press, 2019. All Rights Reserved. Under the terms of the licence agreement, an individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of a monograph in OSO for personal use (for details see www.oxfordscholarship.com/page/privacy-policy).date: 18 July 2019

US–UN Relations in the UN Security Council in the Post‐Cold War Era

US–UN Relations in the UN Security Council in the Post‐Cold War Era

Chapter:
(p.73) 3 US–UN Relations in the UN Security Council in the Post‐Cold War Era
Source:
US Hegemony and International Organizations
Author(s):

David M. Malone (Contributor Webpage)

Publisher:
Oxford University Press
DOI:10.1093/0199261431.003.0004

An examination is made of the evolution of US behaviour in the United Nations Security Council since the 1990s; this behaviour shows an inconsistency born out of a general suspicion of the organization, particularly of its General Assembly, and the author demonstrates that US historical experience of the UN largely explains that suspicion. First provides some evidence of this US inconsistency of behaviour, with reference both to conflict resolution and humanitarian issues. Then goes on to explain the primary influences on this behaviour, arguing that US ambivalence towards the UN has been more affected by struggles over a New International Economic Order in the 1970s and US perceptions of unbalanced UN approaches to the Arab–Israeli dispute than by the end of the cold war. Having made special reference to America's chequered historical experience of the UN, the chapter examines the ways in which negative perceptions of the UN have played out in US domestic politics, particularly since the late 1990s. Finally, America's experience of the UN's expanded post‐cold‐war security agenda is reviewed, noting that the inherent tensions between the promotion of values and the promotion of interests, and the difficulties of relating means to ends, have come sharply to the fore during this period.

Keywords:   ambivalence, behaviour, global organizations, UN, United Nations Security Council, US, US domestic politics, US–UN relations

Oxford Scholarship Online requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books within the service. Public users can however freely search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter.

Please, subscribe or login to access full text content.

If you think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

To troubleshoot, please check our FAQs , and if you can't find the answer there, please contact us .