Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Moral RealismA Defence$
Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content.

Russ Shafer-Landau

Print publication date: 2003

Print ISBN-13: 9780199259755

Published to Oxford Scholarship Online: January 2005

DOI: 10.1093/0199259755.001.0001

Show Summary Details
Page of

PRINTED FROM OXFORD SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (www.oxfordscholarship.com). (c) Copyright Oxford University Press, 2019. All Rights Reserved. An individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of a monograph in OSO for personal use. date: 06 December 2019

Ethical Non-naturalism

Ethical Non-naturalism

Chapter:
(p.55) Ethical Non-naturalism 3
Source:
Moral Realism
Author(s):

Russ Shafer-Landau (Contributor Webpage)

Publisher:
Oxford University Press
DOI:10.1093/0199259755.003.0004

Defends ethical non‐naturalism. Presents G. E. Moore's open question argument as the basis for drawing a natural/non‐natural divide, and discusses various ways of marking the distinction between the natural and the non‐natural. Includes criticisms of ethical naturalism.

Keywords:   ethical non‐naturalism, G.E. Moore, ethical naturalism

Oxford Scholarship Online requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books within the service. Public users can however freely search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter.

Please, subscribe or login to access full text content.

If you think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

To troubleshoot, please check our FAQs , and if you can't find the answer there, please contact us .