Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Environmental Justice and the New PluralismThe Challenge of Difference for Environmentalism$
Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content.

David Schlosberg

Print publication date: 2002

Print ISBN-13: 9780199256419

Published to Oxford Scholarship Online: November 2003

DOI: 10.1093/0199256411.001.0001

Show Summary Details
Page of

PRINTED FROM OXFORD SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (www.oxfordscholarship.com). (c) Copyright Oxford University Press, 2019. All Rights Reserved. Under the terms of the licence agreement, an individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of a monograph in OSO for personal use (for details see www.oxfordscholarship.com/page/privacy-policy).date: 16 July 2019

Pluralism and Difference: A Genealogy of Multiplicity

Pluralism and Difference: A Genealogy of Multiplicity

Chapter:
(p.43) 3 Pluralism and Difference: A Genealogy of Multiplicity
Source:
Environmental Justice and the New Pluralism
Author(s):

David Schlosberg (Contributor Webpage)

Publisher:
Oxford University Press
DOI:10.1093/0199256411.003.0003

An examination is made of a genealogy of pluralist approaches to multiplicity and difference in the twentieth century, starting with William James (1976 [1912], 1977 [1909]), who began his study of pluralism with a ‘radical empiricism’ that is opposed to a more singular, monist position. James argued that our experiences of empirical events diverge, and one explanation could never encompass all of those experiences; other political pluralists (Arthur Bentley, Ernest Barker, Harold Laski, Mary Parker Follett) took James’s critique of absolutism and applied it to the state. Post-Second World War pluralists used the concept of heterogeneity in a much more constricted sense to defend and promote self-interested interest groups. However, more recently, there has been a return to multiplicities, and Donna Haraway’s (1988) description of ‘situated knowledges’ and ‘embodied objectivity’, in which she argues for ‘epistemologies of location’ where claims of knowledge can only be considered partial, resurrects James. The argument here is that a return to such original notions of pluralism helps validate the diversity of experiences and knowledges that grow out of the variety of ways we are all situated in any number of experiences, including environmental degradation.

Keywords:   absolutism, Arthur Bentley, critical pluralism, difference, diversity, Donna Haraway, Ernest Barker, Harold Laski, heterogeneity, Mary Parker Follett, multiplicity, pluralism, political pluralism, theory, William James

Oxford Scholarship Online requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books within the service. Public users can however freely search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter.

Please, subscribe or login to access full text content.

If you think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

To troubleshoot, please check our FAQs , and if you can't find the answer there, please contact us .