Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
EvidentialismEssays in Epistemology$
Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content.

Earl Conee and Richard Feldman

Print publication date: 2004

Print ISBN-13: 9780199253722

Published to Oxford Scholarship Online: August 2004

DOI: 10.1093/0199253722.001.0001

Show Summary Details
Page of

PRINTED FROM OXFORD SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (www.oxfordscholarship.com). (c) Copyright Oxford University Press, 2019. All Rights Reserved. An individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of a monograph in OSO for personal use. date: 22 November 2019

Authoritarian Epistemology

Authoritarian Epistemology

Chapter:
(p.111) 5 Authoritarian Epistemology
Source:
Evidentialism
Author(s):

Richard Feldman (Contributor Webpage)

Publisher:
Oxford University Press
DOI:10.1093/0199253722.003.0006

Several recently defended views give a central role in the nature of epistemic justification to some kind of authority. In one version, the authority is oneself were one to reflect extremely carefully; in another, the authorities are experts in reasoning; and in the third, the expert is God (or “Nature”). This chapter argues that they all have the sort of explanatory flaw that is famously discussed in Plato's Euthyphro.

Keywords:   epistemic objectivity, experts, justification, Richard Foley, Alvin Plantinga, Stephen Stich, subjectivism

Oxford Scholarship Online requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books within the service. Public users can however freely search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter.

Please, subscribe or login to access full text content.

If you think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

To troubleshoot, please check our FAQs , and if you can't find the answer there, please contact us .