Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Leaders' Personalities and the Outcomes of Democratic Elections$
Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content.

Anthony King

Print publication date: 2002

Print ISBN-13: 9780199253135

Published to Oxford Scholarship Online: November 2003

DOI: 10.1093/0199253137.001.0001

Show Summary Details
Page of

PRINTED FROM OXFORD SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (www.oxfordscholarship.com). (c) Copyright Oxford University Press, 2019. All Rights Reserved. An individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of a monograph in OSO for personal use. date: 15 October 2019

The Nonpersonalization of Voting Behavior in Germany

The Nonpersonalization of Voting Behavior in Germany

Chapter:
(p.127) 5 The Nonpersonalization of Voting Behavior in Germany
Source:
Leaders' Personalities and the Outcomes of Democratic Elections
Author(s):

Frank Brettschneider

Oscar W. Gabriel

Publisher:
Oxford University Press
DOI:10.1093/0199253137.003.0005

The federal elections of 1998 were the first time in Germany that notions of personalization and presidentialization were discussed during an election; before that German voters chose, at least formally, between competing parties rather than between competing chancellor candidates, and only a minor role was accorded to the personalities and circumstances of candidates. The first part of this chapter analyses the role that voters’ orientations towards the chancellor–candidates has played in the broad context of electoral choice, paying particular attention to the influence of candidate orientations on the voting choices of people lacking any long–term party identification; this part of the analysis is based on data pertaining to all the electoral contests fought in Germany from 1961 to 1998. The second part of the chapter analyses the various components of the chancellor–candidates’ images: does the way in which voters evaluate the candidates simply reflect existing patterns of party identification, or do the voters construct their own candidate orientations by fitting separate pieces into a pattern, each of which refers to specific attributes of the candidates as perceived and evaluated by them; and are the proponents of the personalization thesis right in assuming that the candidates’ images are largely determined by the voters’ perceptions of the candidates’ personalities rather than by their performance? These questions are answered with specific reference to data collected by the 1998 German Election Study. Despite the apparent personal favouring of Schröder over Kohl in 1998, it is concluded that there is no real evidence that chancellor–candidates’ personalities and other personal characteristics play any stronger role in German voting patterns than they have in the past.

Keywords:   candidate orientations, candidates' personal characteristics, candidates' personalities, chancellor candidates, electoral choice, Germany, voters' orientations, voting choice

Oxford Scholarship Online requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books within the service. Public users can however freely search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter.

Please, subscribe or login to access full text content.

If you think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

To troubleshoot, please check our FAQs , and if you can't find the answer there, please contact us .