Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
The National Co-ordination of EU PolicyThe European Level$
Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content.

Hussein Kassim, Anand Menon, B. Guy Peters, and Vincent Wright

Print publication date: 2001

Print ISBN-13: 9780199248056

Published to Oxford Scholarship Online: November 2004

DOI: 10.1093/0199248052.001.0001

Show Summary Details
Page of

PRINTED FROM OXFORD SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (www.oxfordscholarship.com). (c) Copyright Oxford University Press, 2019. All Rights Reserved. An individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of a monograph in OSO for personal use. date: 16 October 2019

Representing the United Kingdom in Brussels: The Fine Art of Positive Co‐ordination

Representing the United Kingdom in Brussels: The Fine Art of Positive Co‐ordination

Chapter:
(p.47) 1 Representing the United Kingdom in Brussels: The Fine Art of Positive Co‐ordination
Source:
The National Co-ordination of EU Policy
Author(s):

Hussein Kassim (Contributor Webpage)

Publisher:
Oxford University Press
DOI:10.1093/0199248052.003.0002

This chapter examines the co-ordination of UK policy in Brussels, starting by putting the institutions, procedures, and policies that the UK has put in place at the European level in the context of the UK’s strategic or ‘positive’ co-ordination ambition. It then focuses on the role of the UK permanent representation (UKREP) in the system. After briefly outlining its history, the internal organization of UKREP is described, with accounts of its policies relating to personnel (composition, recruitment), its internal processes and working methods, and its responsibilities, roles, and functions. An assessment is then made of the capacity and effectiveness both of UKREP specifically and of the UK co-ordination arrangements more generally. Two arguments are advanced: the first is that the factors that account for the UK’s exacting co-ordination ambition—principally, the centralized nature of its political system, scepticism towards the European project, and a preference for intergovernmentalism over supranationalism—also largely explain why it has been administratively efficient, but not politically effective, at the European level; the second argument relates to devolution, and makes the point that, on the present evidence, the creation of devolved governments in Scotland and Wales does not threaten the co-ordination strategy pursued by the UK since its accession to the European Communities, since despite institutional adjustments made by the devolved authorities, in Brussels UKREP retains its primacy.

Keywords:   administrative efficiency, Brussels, capacity, effectiveness, EU policy, European Union, functions, institutions, internal organization, internal processes, national policy, personnel, policy co-ordination, political ineffectiveness, procedures, responsibilities, roles, UK permanent representation, United Kingdom

Oxford Scholarship Online requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books within the service. Public users can however freely search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter.

Please, subscribe or login to access full text content.

If you think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

To troubleshoot, please check our FAQs , and if you can't find the answer there, please contact us .