Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
The Institutionalization of Europe$
Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content.

Alec Stone Sweet, Wayne Sandholtz, and Neil Fligstein

Print publication date: 2001

Print ISBN-13: 9780199247967

Published to Oxford Scholarship Online: April 2004

DOI: 10.1093/019924796X.001.0001

Show Summary Details
Page of

PRINTED FROM OXFORD SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (www.oxfordscholarship.com). (c) Copyright Oxford University Press, 2019. All Rights Reserved. Under the terms of the licence agreement, an individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of a monograph in OSO for personal use (for details see www.oxfordscholarship.com/page/privacy-policy).date: 22 July 2019

Judicial Rulemaking and the Institutionalization of European Union Sex Equality Policy

Judicial Rulemaking and the Institutionalization of European Union Sex Equality Policy

Chapter:
(p.113) 6 Judicial Rulemaking and the Institutionalization of European Union Sex Equality Policy
Source:
The Institutionalization of Europe
Author(s):

Rachel A. Cichowski (Contributor Webpage)

Publisher:
Oxford University Press
DOI:10.1093/019924796X.003.0006

An examination is made of the impact of the European Court of Justice (ECJ) on the institutional evolution of European Union sex equality policy, following the provision in the Treaty of Rome (Art. 119 EEC, now Art. 141) that men and women would receive equal pay for equal work – a provision aimed at protecting businesses from unfair competition. This same provision now bestows a positive right on individuals throughout the Member States, and is a judicially enforceable right that remains the backbone of an ever-expanding European social-justice policy. Over time, strategic action on the part of litigants and their lawyers and the ECJ’s judicial rule-making capacity has constructed a supranational space in which women can not only demand the right to equal pay but can also receive protection as pregnant workers. This dynamic process is the focus of the analysis presented, and involves an examination of three basic mechanisms of institutional evolution: the process by which self-interested private litigants and their lawyers are able to activate the European Union (EU) legal system through the Art. 177 (now Art. 234) procedure (which allows national individuals to invoke EU law before national courts); the ECJ’s authoritative interpretation of Art. 119 (focusing on how it became directly effective in national legal systems); and the feedback effects of this judicial rule-making in terms of how the litigation environment has been changed, and the EU and national-level policy consequence. In particular, the latter are traced through the development of EU pregnancy and maternity rights.

Keywords:   equal pay, European Court of Justice, European policy, European Union, European Union legal system, institutional evolution, institutionalization, litigation, maternity rights, national legal systems, national policy, pregnancy rights, sex equality, social-justice policy, supranational policy, Treaty of Rome

Oxford Scholarship Online requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books within the service. Public users can however freely search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter.

Please, subscribe or login to access full text content.

If you think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

To troubleshoot, please check our FAQs , and if you can't find the answer there, please contact us .