Poses a question that the preceding historical survey raises for contemporary faith. Orthodox Trinitarianism, and the Nicene Creed in which it finds classical expression, were hammered out in the course of the fourth‐century debate with Arianism. How far does the revised understanding of that debate, to which modern historical study points, put in question the kind of authority that traditional faith has normally ascribed to its outcome? The eighteenth century was able to pursue the issues in terms close to that of the original debate, because its understanding of the world and of the nature of scripture was closer to that of the fourth century than to that of the twenty‐first. Is the historical survey outlined in the book one where historical study should be freeing us from being too closely bound by our historical past?
Oxford Scholarship Online requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books within the service. Public users can however freely search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter.
If you think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.