Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
The Federal VisionLegitimacy and Levels of Governance in the United States and the European Union$
Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content.

Kalypso Nicolaidis and Robert Howse

Print publication date: 2001

Print ISBN-13: 9780199245000

Published to Oxford Scholarship Online: November 2003

DOI: 10.1093/0199245002.001.0001

Show Summary Details
Page of

PRINTED FROM OXFORD SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (www.oxfordscholarship.com). (c) Copyright Oxford University Press, 2020. All Rights Reserved. An individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of a monograph in OSO for personal use. date: 22 February 2020

Blueprints for Change: Devolution and Subsidiarity in the United States and the European Union

Blueprints for Change: Devolution and Subsidiarity in the United States and the European Union

Chapter:
(p.118) 4 Blueprints for Change: Devolution and Subsidiarity in the United States and the European Union
Source:
The Federal Vision
Author(s):

David Lazer

Viktor Mayer‐Schoenberger

Publisher:
Oxford University Press
DOI:10.1093/0199245002.003.0005

Examines the most recent attempts in both the USA and the EU to respond to attacks on the legitimacy of ‘federal’ governance by building into the legislative or regulatory processes a federalism or subsidiarity criterion. The authors show that such criteria, when formulated as guidance on ‘where’ policy should be made, have been largely ineffective and inoperable; ‘federalism’ criteria have been subsumed and assumed away under either purely political decisions over the scope of devolution or broader cost‐benefit analysis in the USA, and the EU has not abandoned significant policies under its ‘subsidiarity review’. In contrast, there has been increased use of ‘how’ criteria, which increase accountability of central decision‐making by requiring a publicized process of justification for the policies. ‘Procedural subsidiarity’ is a concept relevant to governance on both sides, as they each have come to focus on how to provide more discretion to lower levels of governance in implementing or administering federal policies—although that has been achieved in very different ways in the USA and the EU. In short, the authors make the case that new sources of legitimate governance are not mainly to be found in the recent subsidiarity and devolution pledges appended to the USA and EU covenants.

Keywords:   accountability, central decision‐making, cost‐benefit analysis, decision‐making, devolution, EU, federal governance, federalism, governance, how criteria, policy‐making, procedural subsidiarity, regulatory processes, subsidiarity, USA, where criteria

Oxford Scholarship Online requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books within the service. Public users can however freely search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter.

Please, subscribe or login to access full text content.

If you think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

To troubleshoot, please check our FAQs , and if you can't find the answer there, please contact us .